Skip to content
cropped-jordan_gazette_logo_1-removebg-preview.png

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • Jordan
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Companies news
  • Submit A Press Release
Light/Dark Button
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Business
  • UK firms risk being left behind as AI adoption gap widens, warns PwC
  • Business

UK firms risk being left behind as AI adoption gap widens, warns PwC

British companies are spending less on AI and seeing weaker returns than global leaders, with PwC warning the next 12 months are critical for UK firms to close the gap. Read more: UK firms risk being left behind as AI adoption gap widens, warns PwC
Mahdeehassan 1 month ago (Last updated: 1 month ago) 3 minutes read
UK firms risk being left behind as AI adoption gap widens, warns PwC - firms risk

British businesses are in danger of being left stranded in the middle of the pack on artificial intelligence, with a new PwC study revealing a significant gap between UK firms and the world’s top AI adopters in both spending and returns.

The consultancy’s global survey found that while leading companies worldwide are investing an average of five per cent of revenue in AI and reaping returns of 15 per cent, their British counterparts are committing just two per cent and generating returns of ten per cent. It is a gap that should alarm boardrooms across the country, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises already grappling with tight margins and limited budgets for technology transformation.

Perhaps more troubling is the innovation shortfall the figures suggest. UK businesses derived only 27 per cent of their revenue from products that did not exist three years ago, compared with 43 per cent among global leaders. For SMEs, which have historically relied on agility and fresh thinking to compete against larger rivals, that disparity ought to prompt some uncomfortable questions about whether enough is being done to turn AI capability into genuinely new commercial offerings.

The research points to familiar obstacles. Outdated IT systems and rigid internal processes continue to hold companies back, with only 27 per cent of UK businesses having redesigned their workflows to properly integrate AI rather than simply grafting it on to what already exists. The same proportion had modernised legacy technology to better accommodate the tools.

There is also a question of ambition

Nearly half of the UK businesses surveyed said efficiency and productivity were their primary motivation for experimenting with AI, while just 26 per cent cited revenue generation. It is a mindset that Leigh Bates, PwC UK’s global risk AI leader, believes is limiting the country’s potential.

Bates described the findings as a wake-up call, arguing that too many firms remain trapped between piloting AI projects and scaling them effectively. The businesses seeing the greatest returns globally, he said, are not merely doing more of the same but fundamentally reinventing how they operate.

Overall, the UK ranked 11th out of 19 countries in PwC’s assessment, behind China at the top of the table, as well as France, Germany and Saudi Arabia. The United States, notably, fared little better at 13th. PwC defined global leaders as companies in the top 20 per cent of AI-driven performance.

For Britain’s SME community, the message is clear enough. The window to move from cautious experimentation to meaningful adoption is narrowing, and those that continue to treat AI as little more than a cost-cutting exercise risk discovering that their competitors, at home and abroad, have already moved on.


Amy Ingham

Amy is a newly qualified journalist specialising in business journalism at Business Matters with responsibility for news content for what is now the UK’s largest print and online source of current business news.
View all posts

Tags: Already British Business Businesses Companies Global Returns Revenue

Post navigation

Previous: Founders push for ‘repeat entrepreneur relief’ to keep exit capital flowing back into UK start-ups
Next: Virgin StartUp opens second round of free accelerator for dyslexic entrepreneurs

Related Stories

88 Vs. 89 Octane: What's The Difference Between These Fuel Grades? - octane what's
  • Business

88 Vs. 89 Octane: What’s The Difference Between These Fuel Grades?

Mahdeehassan 14 hours ago
7 Professional-Grade Tools Made By Ryobi - professional-grade tools
  • Business

7 Professional-Grade Tools Made By Ryobi

Mahdeehassan 14 hours ago
Ridgid Nuke Vs Makita: How Does Home Depot's New Subcompact Tool Line Compare? - ridgid nuke
  • Business

Ridgid Nuke Vs Makita: How Does Home Depot’s New Subcompact Tool Line Compare?

Mahdeehassan 14 hours ago

    You May Have Missed

    88 Vs. 89 Octane: What's The Difference Between These Fuel Grades? - octane what's
    • Business

    88 Vs. 89 Octane: What’s The Difference Between These Fuel Grades?

    Mahdeehassan 14 hours ago
    7 Professional-Grade Tools Made By Ryobi - professional-grade tools
    • Business

    7 Professional-Grade Tools Made By Ryobi

    Mahdeehassan 14 hours ago
    Ridgid Nuke Vs Makita: How Does Home Depot's New Subcompact Tool Line Compare? - ridgid nuke
    • Business

    Ridgid Nuke Vs Makita: How Does Home Depot’s New Subcompact Tool Line Compare?

    Mahdeehassan 14 hours ago
    What Is The US Military's Longest Range Air-To-Air Missile And How Far Can It Go? - what military's
    • Business

    What Is The US Military’s Longest Range Air-To-Air Missile And How Far Can It Go?

    Mahdeehassan 15 hours ago

    Categories

    • Business (1,201)
    • Companies News (1,240)
    • Jordan (100)
    • Lifestyle (105)
    • MENA Business (18)
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    Jordan Gazette © {2026} All rights reserved. | ReviewNews by AF themes.